Friday, December 14, 2012

Fall Semester Reflection


Do you read your colleagues’ work online? How often? What is it like to read their work? How does being able to see everyone’s work online at any given time change the way you do your work?

I read my colleagues work online a lot of the time, probably once a week I will go through some random blogs and read what my classmates have to say. Its interesting to see the way that different people think and since Blogger shows times, it's also interesting to see how crazy of times things are posted.

How has the publicly and always visible course blog made this course different from one without a blog? 
How would the course change if the course blog disappeared tomorrow?

Since my blog is visible to ANYONE in the world it is important that I always put my best work up and that it is appropriate. The way people look at my blog alters the way they think of Dr. Preston and of Righetti High School.

Has publishing your work for the public to see changed your approach to completing an assignment? How so? How would your feelings about the course change if you couldn’t publish your work that way?

Publishing my work definitely is a different feeling than just turning in a paper. With publishing the work, you can virtually turn it in any time that day and it will still be on time. I like the fact that this class in basically run online. It teaches us so much everyday.

Has your experience of the physical classroom changed because of the open & online aspects? Where does your learning actually happen? 

The physical classroom is no longer just the classroom for me. I learn everywhere now because of this class. Online aspects are a great thing and it integrates so much more in than just the standard "English" class. The classroom now is a place for me to discuss my learning with my colleagues, whereas before I actually saw things first there. 

You were described in the Macarthur Foundation/DML interview as “a pioneer”-- how do you describe the experience on the edge to people who haven’t been there (friends and family)?

There is no better word for what I'm doing than a "pioneer" We have been through so many struggles whether online or in class and have come together to learn how to fix it. This wasn't easy getting used to but in the end I wouldn't have it any other way. The online aspect makes it so that our class is never ending, even at 2 am., the weekends, or on holiday break there is always someone to talk to.
How do they respond when you describe the brave new world in which you’re working?
What do their responses mean to you? What effect(s) (if any) do they have on you?

Alot of people are very surprised when I tell them that I blog and that my class is run online. When I tell adults this, they think its an act of laziness on the teachers part because they dont have to do paperwork etc. I immediately correct them and say that all my colleagues and teacher has put SO much work into their blogs. Its the place for ultimate learning and a lot of effort go into these things on a daily basis.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

MAN OUR BLOGS SUCK

As it's the middle of the night and I'm doing some last minute blog maintenance I decided to compare my blog with my classmates. All I can say is that a majority of the blogs have not been updated in over a month. I honestly thought mine was bad but then looked again and WOW mine is pretty good!(: Please take that into account Dr. Preston!

Monday, December 10, 2012

Literature Analysis #5 Of Mice and Men




Of Mice and Men

GENERAL
1. Briefly summarize the plot of the novel you read, and explain how the narrative fulfills the author's purpose (based on your well-informed interpretation of same).



George is a small little man and Lennie is a giant of a man with huge arms. They are both laborers who live near Salinas, CA and roam around looking for work. One night while talking they were discussing their dream of owning their own piece of land. Lennie wants to have rabbits and let them live on the land. The next day, George and Lennie travel to a ranch and they find work. They are given two beds in the bunkhouse. Then Old Candy introduces them to almost everybody on the ranch. They meet the boss and the boss’s son Curley, who is quite rude. They also meet Curley’s wife when she comes looking for her husband. She wears heavy make-up and possesses a flirtatious attitude. George warns Lennie to behave his best around Curley and his wife. He also suggests that they should meet by the pool if anything unfortunate happens to either of them on the ranch. George and Lennie are assigned to work with Slim, whohas common sense and they like him. George finds Slim an understanding confidante, and a bond forms between the two of them. When Curley wrongly accuses Slim for talking to his wife, Slim gets very angry. Curley apologizes to him in the bunkhouse in front of everybody, but his apology is rejected. Curley vents his frustration on Lennie, trying to pick a fight. Lennie does not hit back initially, but when George asks him to, Lennie obeys and crushes Curley’s hand. Curley agrees that he will not tell anyone about his hand, for it would mean losing his self-respect. While working on the ranch, George and Lennie continue to dream about owning their own piece of land and make plans accordingly. Old Candy, one of the ranch hands, overhears their planning and asks to join them. He even offers to contribute all of his savings to purchase the land. George and Lennie accept his proposal. One evening, Lennie, looking for his puppy, enters the room of Crooks; since he is the only black man on the ranch, Crooks lives alone, separated from the other ranch workers. Candy enters, looking for Lennie; the two of them tell Crooks about their dream of owning their own ranch, but Crooks tells them that it will never happen, foreshadowing the truth. Curley’s wife comes in and interrupts them. When Crooks objects to her presence in his room, she threatens him with a false rape charge. Later on, Lennie is seen alone in the barn, petting his dead pup. He has unintentionally killed it by handling it too hard. Now he is grieving over the loss. Curley’s wife walks into the barn and strikes up a conversation with Lennie. As they talk, she asks him to stroke her hair. She panics when she feels Lennie’s strong hands. When she raises her voice to him, Lennie covers her mouth. In the process, he accidentally breaks her neck and she dies. Knowing he has done something terrible, he leaves the ranch. When the ranch hands learn that Curley’s wife has been killed, they rightly guess the guilty party. Led by an angry Curley, they all go out to search for Lennie. They plan to murder him in retribution. George guesses where Lennie is and races to the pool. To save him from the brutal assaults of the ranch hands, George mercifully kills his friend himself. Hearing the gunshot, the searchers converge by the pool. They praise George for his act. Only Slim understands the actual purpose of George’s deed.



2. Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid cliches.



The theme of this novel is friendship as George and Lennie have a unique friendship that started from them just being laborers. Since Lennie is a gentle giant, no body knows how to communicate with him and act around him. George is the only one who really understands Lennie and Georgo also knows that he did not purposefully kill Curley’s wife. At the end of the novel when the riot is coming to kill Lennie, George ends up killing him instead because he can’t stand to see the others kill out of hate.



3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).



The tone in Of Mice and Men is a dismal one. The tone is simple and Steinbeck never puts thoughts into your head for you to purposefully think something of any character. You learn and judge the characters based on the actual actions and you are able to make up your own mind about the characters. Throughout the story when Lennie kills the dog and then also kills Curley’s wife we don’t think ill of him. Steinbeck portrays Lennie as such he doesn’t mean to do any harm but his uncontrollable strength gets in the way and he cannot help it. An example of the non judgmental and innocent tone are portrayed in these passages.



Here the rabbits represent something gentle and vulnerable. The rabbits come up a lot especially since Lennie wants a rabbit to himself.



"Evening of a hot day started the little wind to moving among the leaves. The shade climbed up the hills toward the top. On the sand banks the rabbits sat as quietly as little gray, sculptured stones.” Ch.1



This passage from Ch. 1 is George and Lennie talking about the land they would buy and the house they will have together. Their dreams are big and in a way naïve. The naïve essence of it shows how innocent and unaware they are of the world. Especially Lennie



"All kin's a vegetables in the garden, and if we want a little whisky we can sell a few eggs or something, or some milk. We'd jus' live there. We'd belong there. There wouldn't be no more runnin' round the country and gettin' fed by a Jap cook. No, sir, we'd have our own place where we belonged and not sleep in no bunk house."



The last example is, “We could live offa the fatta the lan'.” Lennie says this various time throughout the novel and it portrays how excited he is for his dream to live off of the land.







4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)

CHARACTERIZATION
1. Describe two examples of direct characterization and two examples of indirect characterization..



An example of direct characterization would be when the author writes “Curley was quick and mean.” The reader does not have to make any conclusions because the author/narrator states the trait directly.



Another example of direct characterization is when Steinbeck describes Carlson on pg. 35. “A powerful, big stomached man came into the bunk house. His head still dripped water from the scrubbing and dousing.”



An example of indirect characterization is when Curelys Wife is perceived as a 'tart' through her actions and the way she speaks to other men on the ranch, you could also comment on the fact that being labelled as 'Curelys Wife' with no name shows how the characters just see hers as Curley's property.



One more example of indirect characterization is when Slim- the Jerkiline Skinner, who despite his lack of dialect (he doesn't speak much in the novel compared to other main characters) gains great respect from each character on the ranch. also the way each of his actions are done with correct thinking.



The author uses both approaches because it gives the text variety.




2. Does the author's syntax and/or diction change when s/he focuses on character? How? Example(s)?



Yes the authors syntax and diction change dramatically when the characters are talking. They do not talk in proper English and sometimes it can be hard to interpret. An example is when George speaks to Lennie and says, “You can jus’ as well go to hell,” “You now shut up.” The words are all over the place especially when speaking between characters.




3. Is the protagonist static or dynamic? Flat or round? Explain.



The protagonist in the novel is George. Although there are plenty of different characters in the story, we can relate to George the most. Lennie has a mental problem, Curley is too mean, and Slim too wonderful. George is the protagonist. He is also a dynamic character because he changes a lot throughout the story. In the beginning, he was a person who believed in his dream farm. Now at the end, he has killed his best friend and no longer believes in the idea of having his own farm. He is alo round as he encounters conflict and changes from it.




4. After reading the book did you come away feeling like you'd met a person or read a character? Analyze one textual example that illustrates your reaction.



I think after reading this book I felt like I had read about a character. The time period is different from my own and there are not a lot of people now a days who are laborers. The ending was extremely sad and I understood why George killed Lennie but I don’t think that was a realistic thing to do.



A textual example is when George kills Lennie and Slim comments.



“Never you mind. A guy got to sometimes ”









Literary Analysis #4 The Scarlet Letter


The Scarlett Letter

GENERAL
1. Briefly summarize the plot of the novel you read, and explain how the narrative fulfills the author's purpose (based on your well-informed interpretation of same).

 The novel begins in 17th-century Boston, Massachusetts. A young woman, Hester Prynne, is led from prison with her baby daughter, Pearl, in her arms and the scarlet letter “A” on her bosom. The scarlet letter "A" represents that she has committed adultery and the letter is on her chest for all to see. One woman who is in the crowd tells an elderly stranger that Hester is being punished for adultery. It turns out that Hester’s husband was sent to America and was lost at sea because he never showed up. She now has a new baby with a different man and Hester will not tell who the father is. The reason she is getting hung is because she is keeping the mysterious lover a secret.

The elderly onlooker is Hester’s missing husband, who is now practicing medicine and calling himself Roger Chillingworth. He lives in Boston, and wants revenge. He reveals his true identity to no one but Hester, whom he has sworn to secrecy. Several years pass. Hester supports herself by working as a seamstress, and Pearl (her daughter) grows into a determined, naughty child, who is more of a symbol than an actual character, said to be the scarlet letter come to life as both Hester's love and her punishment. They are shunned by the community and they live in a small cottage on the outskirts of Boston. The police try to take Pearl away from Hester but with Arthur Dimmesdale’s help they can stay together. Dimmesdale is suffering from heart problems and now lives with Chillingworth so that he can take care of him. Chillingworth begins to suspect something from Dimmesdale and one day looks at his chest and there he discovers an “A” for adultery.

Hester arranges to meet DImmesdale in the forest and they make a plan to move back to Europe and take Pearl. They will sail out of Boston and Chillingworth gets notice of this plan and also will be on the same ship out of Boston. Dimmesdale is making him last sermon when he sees Hester and Pearl standing afar. He then immediately mounts the scaffold with Hester and their daughter and shows everyone the A on his chest. He falls dead just after Pearl kisses him.

Frustrated, Chillingworth dies a year later. Hester and Pearl leave Boston, and no one knows what has happened to them. Many years later, Hester returns alone, still wearing the scarlet letter, to live in her old cottage and resume her charitable work. She receives letters from Pearl, who now has a family of her own. Pearl also inherits all of Chillingworth's money even though he knows she is not his daughter. When Hester dies, she is buried in "a new grave near an old and sunken one, in that burial ground beside which King's Chapel has since been built. It was near that old and sunken grave, yet with[in] a space between, as if the dust of the two sleepers had no right to mingle. Yet one tombstone served for both." The tombstone was decorated with a letter "A", and Hester and Dimmesdale share the grave.
                                                                                                                                         
2. Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid cliches.

The theme of the novel is Sin and a great matter in the Puritan community. Religious sin is associated with breaking the law. In this novel, we see a lot of sins and Roger Chillingworth’s need of revenge is a "worse sin" than the passion that led Hester Prynne and Arthur Dimmesdale to commit adultery. Every character in the book believes that idea sin should be punished, if not here on earth by man, than by God after death. Committing sin is regarded as willfully allowing the Black Man (Satan) to place his mark upon your soul.

3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).

The authors tone in the novel is detached and impassionate. The author always is talking about how many problems there are within puritan society and it is obvious he does not support it. Any time he is showing any opinion it is detached and cold.

4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)

CHARACTERIZATION
1. Describe two examples of direct characterization and two examples of indirect characterization.  Why does the author use both approaches, and to what end (i.e., what is your lasting impression of the character as a result)?

The author uses both types of characterization to put variety in the novel.

An example of direct characterization is when Hawthorne says, “She was beautiful, tall, thin, and dignified.” All of these adjectives literally describe Hester.

This quote from Chapter 7 is also an example of direct characterization. “The mother herself- as if the red ignominy were so deeply scorched into her brain that all her conceptions assumed its form-had carefully wrought out the similitude; lavishing many hours of morbid ingenuity to create an analogy the object of her affection and the emblem of her guilt and torture.”

An example of indirect characterization is when Hester Prynne, In the beginning (which later diminishes) she is thought of as a shameless tramp through the eyes of the women in the town, but really she is dignified in that while walking down the prison steps, she doesn't rush herself, she holds her shoulders back, and head up. Hawthorne writes this to show that she is not ashamed of what she has done and she needs to accept her sin.

Another example is later in the novel, she is considered to be loyal, seeing as though she will not give up the name of her child's father. She is also thought of as very charitable with all the work she does for the poor.

2. Does the author's syntax and/or diction change when s/he focuses on character?  How?  Example(s)?

Nathaniel Hawthorns diction did not change when he solely focused on a character. The choice of words and placement of them stayed generally the same.

3. Is the protagonist static or dynamic?  Flat or round?  Explain.

Hester is the protagonist and I consider her a dynamic character because throughout the story she changes the way people think of her by doing good for others in the face of abuse. As a result, she grows more patient and kind until she is considered a saint by those who remember her. If she was simply the sinner who never changed, she wouldn't have spent her time doing good to the point of - later in life - being considered a saint by the people of the community. She has a "moment" of rebellion when she takes off the letter and wants to run away with Arthur, but that's temporary. However, she still grows as a character and changes inwardly. Hester also demonstrates the actions that of a round character.

4. After reading the book did you come away feeling like you'd met a person or read a character?  Analyze one textual example that illustrates your reaction.

After reading this book I felt like I had come away reading a character. I think the rules in ths novel were a bit too strict although it was a Puritan society. Even Hester’s baby, Pearl, was written to be more of a symbol for the letter A than to represent an actual child.

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

No Exit

1. If I was to create hell I think it would be a place I couldn't escape. I like knowing answers to everything and without answers I am lost. The ultimate hell for me would be where I was trapped in a maze and can't get out. I think that would be really terrible. I think there is no way to find peace in a hellish environment because that's what hell is: somewhere you can't stand.
2. I definitely believe that too much of a good thing or too much of a bad thing can eventually be bad. Everything is nice in moderation and hell can be too much of one thing.
3. Satre creates a sense of hell by describing what the three characters see around them. You understand what they are going through by what they do and don't say to each other. I think a hell on Earth would be were there is no freedom or room for growth.  You need opportunities to grow as a person and that is what makes me happy. Without ever accomplishing anything, to me that would be like hell.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

Allegory of the Cave Sonnet

A couple men lived in a cave
They spent their whole life there
They were chained as such they were a slave
and their chance of escaping was rare

All they knew was what they saw
Their brains were mostly empty
The one who was freed was in awe
Because of what he would see

The shadows were just a vision
They were made to deceive
Not one could make a smart decision
The men were made to believe

The free man saw beyond the cave
He escaped and was no longer a slave



Monday, November 19, 2012

Literary Analysis #3 Lord of the Flies



Lord of the Flies
GENERAL
1. Briefly summarize the plot of the novel you read, and explain how the narrative fulfills the author's purpose (based on your well-informed interpretation of same).
Lord of the Flies by William Golding is about a group of boys who get stranded on an island. Their plane crashes and they are faced against a lot of circumstances to survive. The boys quickly separate into two groups; one which is focused on getting rescued and eventually trying to get off the island and the other which was focused on trying to survive and sustain life on the island. Jack is the leader of the hunters and he is trying to survive while Ralph is putting efforts into getting rescued. One day a ship passes by but goes unnoticed because it is the hunters responsibility but they were not paying attention. Ralph is furious and Piggy gets mad at Jack and then Jack hits Piggy across the face. Ralph calls a meeting to order and they discuss what is happening. It has been clear that the little boys think there is a monster on the island. What it really is, is the body of a parachute but still the presence of a beast is there. They find the parachutes body and it is official that the beast has attacked the island. Jack and Ralph go to look for the beast and as they go up the mountain they argue quite a bit. When they are back at the beach they separate and many of the boys are more interested in hunting and join Jack. Jack declares himself the leader of the new group and they decide to slaughter the pig and offer it to the beast as an offering. The voice is the lord of the flies and speaks to Simon and tells him that they can never get rid of the beast for he is in all men. The two groups fight and Piggy is killed and the conch is shattered. They are going after Ralph and he barely escapes. Ralph hides for the rest of the night and the following day, while the others hunt him like an animal. Jack has the other boys  light the forest on fire to make Ralph come out of his hiding place. Ralph collapses in exhaustion, but when he looks up, he sees a British naval officer standing over him. The officer’s ship noticed the fire raging in the jungle. The other boys reach the beach and stop in their tracks at the sight of the officer. Amazed at the spectacle of this group of bloodthirsty, savage children, the officer asks Ralph to explain. Ralph is overwhelmed by the knowledge that he is safe but, thinking about what has happened on the island, he begins to weep. The other boys begin to sob as well. The officer turns his back so that the boys may regain their composure and takes them all home.

2. Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid cliches.
The theme of the novel is the loss of innocence as the boys came from a strict prep school to them killing each other. They are bloodthirsty and have lost all order in their lives. As the book gets further along they become more and more savage, eventually they turn into the beast. The beast is within them. By being exposed to the world with no rules and regulations their inner beast comes out and their innocence is lost.

3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).
The tone of the novel is dark and unflinching as Golding examines the worst parts about humans. The darkest side of human nature is shown throughout these examples.
[Jack] tried to convey the compulsion to track down and kill that was swallowing him up.
“I went on. I thought, by myself –”
The madness came into his eyes again.
“I thought I might kill.”  Chapter 3

[Jack] began to dance and his laughter became a bloodthirsty snarling. Chapter 4

 “We spread round. I crept, on hands and knees. The spears fell out because they hadn’t barbs on. The pig ran away and made an awful noise –”
“It turned back and ran into the circle, bleeding –”
All the boys were talking at once, relieved and excited.
[…]
Then Maurice pretended to be the pig and ran squealing into the center, and the hunters, circling still, pretended to beat him. As they danced, they sang.
“Kill the pig. Cut her throat. Bash her in.”
Ralph watched them, envious and resentful. Chapter 4

4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)

CHARACTERIZATION
1. Describe two examples of direct characterization and two examples of indirect characterization.  Why does the author use both approaches, and to what end (i.e., what is your lasting impression of the character as a result)?
An example of direct characterization is when Golding describes Piggy. He says that he is short, fat, and chubby. He is also the shy one and sensible which is known because he wears glasses
An example of indirect characterization is when Ralph, however, is not responsive. "Ralph said nothing . . . Protected from the sun, ignoring Piggy's ill-omened talk, he dreamed pleasantly."
Another indirect characterization is of Simon. The novel states  “Here the littluns who had run after him and caught up with him. They talked, cried out unintelligibly, lugged him toward the tree. Then amid the roar of bees in the afternoon sunlight, Simon found for them the fruit they could not reach…. Passed them back to the endless, outstretched hands. “

2. Does the author's syntax and/or diction change when s/he focuses on character?  How?  Example(s)?
The authors syntax and diction throughout the novel is more or less the same. A lot the passages are revolved around innocence. Some examples are..
Then, amid the roar of bees in the afternoon sunlight, Simon found for [the littluns] the fruit they could not reach, pulled off the choicest from up in the foliage, passed them back down to the endless, outstretched hands. Chapter 3
The tears began to flow and sobs shook him. He gave himself up to them now for the first time on the island; great, shuddering spasms of grief that seemed to wrench his whole body. His voice rose under the black smoke before the burning wreckage of the island; and infected by that emotion, the other little boys began to shake and sob too. And in the middle of them, with filthy body, matted hair, and un wiped nose, Ralph wept for the end of innocence, the darkness of man’s heart, and the fall through the air of the true, wise friend called Piggy. Chapter 12

3. Is the protagonist static or dynamic?  Flat or round?  Explain.
The protagonist in the story is Ralph. He is definitely a dynamic character as he changes so much throughout the story. He encounters problems and changes things because of it and he is a round character also. At the beginning of the novel Ralph is obviously the leader and throughout he is getting out shadowed by Jack. His morals change and his innocence is lost. Ralph changes a lot throughout the novel

4. After reading the book did you come away feeling like you'd met a person or read a character?  Analyze one textual example that illustrates your reaction.
After reading this novel I felt as though I read some characters. The characters were well thought out and the theme was an excellent one but I felt as if it were kind of fake and only written to get the message across. An example of some parts that are not believable are "'Fear can't hurt you any more than a dream. There aren't any beasts to be afraid of on this island....Serve you right if something did get you, you useless lot of cry-babies!" Chapter 5, pg. 75
No one is that rude and speaks to little children like that. I think the characters are just written rudely to show how the older boys have lost their innocence.

My Big Question

John Locke said that people were born good. Thomas Hobbes was in disagreement and stated that people are born evil. My big question is,

Are humans born good and learn the secrets of evil through others and life or are we born evil and taught to do good by people who love us etc.?

Friday, November 16, 2012

Plato's Allegory of the Cave Study Questions

1. According to Socrates, what does the Allegory of the Cave represent?

According to Socrates, there are three prisoners trapped inside of a cave. They have been chained there their whole life. The cave represents their own limitations. Shadows are cast on the wall in front of them and that's all they look at every single day. They are made to believe that what they see is real. They know nothing else and even though the shadows are put there on purpose, the prisoners don't know any better.  We reject reality a lot of the time and unless we are shown the right way or the truth (the sun) we will never know what is true.

2. What are the key elements in the imagery used in the allegory?

The prisoners represent our own ignorance. The sun represents the the truth. The shackles and chains represent things holding us back, and the one freed prisoner is supposed to represent a philosopher.

3. What are some things the allegory suggests about the process of enlightenment or education?

The allegory shows that when an opportunity is thrown upon you (the prisoner getting freed) you must be willing to take advantage of it. Sometimes you are not offered that opportunity. Do not be fooled by what you see and believe, and listen to those who have more experience than you.

4. What do the imagery of "shackles" and the "cave" suggest about the perspective of the cave dwellers or prisoners?

The shackles show how the men are technically prisoners. They are chained down and cannot even move their head to turn around. They see only what is in front of them. The cave is like the prison, the home to these people that have complete ignorance.

5. In society today or in your own life, what sorts of things shackle the mind?

In society I think our job shackles the mind. Mainly minimum wage jobs are this way. They use you, turn you into a robot and make it known that you are safe there for the rest of your life. There is no room to grow or expand. They want you in there working for your whole life and hope that you are ignorant enough to stay.

6. Compare the perspective of the freed prisoner with the cave prisoners?

The perspective of the freed prisoner and that of the cave prisoner vary greatly. Those in the cave only see what is presented. The cutouts in front of the fire to create shadows manipulate the cave prisoner. The freed prisoner has seen the sun and therefore knows all. He knows there is more out there than just the cave. He can believe what he wants to believe now.

7. According to the allegory, lack of clarity or intellectual confusion can occur in two distinct ways or contexts. What are they?

Intellectual confusion happened to the freed prisoner when he was released from the shackles. He was not sure what to do or where to go since he had never been anywhere before.

8. According to the allegory, how do cave prisoners get free? What does this suggest about intellectual freedom?

Socrates states that the cave prisoners may only be freed like this: The good fortune to somehow free themselves of their chain; The ability to listen to the freed prisoner and explore the world outside the cave. It is suggested that only by cooperative contemplation combined with individual will and effort that we as people can come to freedom.

9. The allegory presupposes that there is a distinction between appearances and reality. Do you agree? Why or why not?

There is an immense distinction between appearances and reality. Things are not always what they seem, as a matter of fact they are not. The shadows were not what they were portrayed to be and it was all a distortion in appearance. 

10. If Socrates is incorrect in his assumption that there is a distinction between reality and appearances, what are the two alternative metaphysical assumptions?

The alternative to Socrates assumption would be that everything is what it appears to be. Everything is concrete and there were no illusions or trickery.

Friday, November 2, 2012

My Sonnet: A Sonnet On Hate


A Sonnet On Hate

No deep abyss of ocean drowns like hate,
Entombing all within its murky depth,
Consigning struggling hope to lose all breath
And plunge, submerging to her final fate.
No lofty mountain climbs to hate’s full height
Which no appeasing plea can ever scale
And reconciliation can but fail
If she should try surmounting in her plight.
No spreading sea is wider that hate’s breadth
Which no barque of compassion tries to cross
For it is sure to founder, with the loss
Of innocence, condemned to dismal death.
But hate itself can swim, and climb and sail
Away, if love returns to reconcile. 

Monday, October 29, 2012

Fall Vocab List #10

Aficionado- a serious devotee of some particular genre, thing, person, etc.


Browbeat- to discourage or frighten with threats or a domineering manner; intimidate


Commensurate- able to be measured by a common standard


Diaphanous- Of such fine texture as to be transparent or translucent


Emolument- Payment for an office or employment


Foray- an initial venture


Genre- a class or category of artistic endeavor having a particular form, content, technique, or the like: the genre of epic poetry;


Homily- An inspirational saying or platitude


Immure- To confine within or as if within walls; imprison


Insouciant- carefree or unconcerned; light-hearted


Matrix- a substance, situation, or environment in which something has its origin, takes
form, or is enclosed


Obsequies- A funeral rite or ceremony


Panache- a grand or flamboyant manner; verve; style; flair: The actor who would play Cyrano must have panache.


Persona- The role that one assumes or displays in public or society; one's public image or


Personality- as distinguished from the inner self


Philippic- a bitter or impassioned speech of denunciation; invective


Prurient
- unusually or morbidly interested in sexual thoughts or practices


Sacrosanct- Regarded as sacred and inviolable


Systemic- Of or relating to systems or a system


Tendentious- having or showing a definite tendency, bias, or purpose: a tendentious novel.


Vicissitude- A change or variation

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Literary Analysis #2 The Great Gatsby


The Great Gatsby

GENERAL

1. Briefly summarize the plot of the novel you read, and explain how the narrative fulfills the author's purpose (based on your well-informed interpretation of same).

Nick Carroway, the protagonist, has recently moved from the Midwest to get his career started in New York. He lives on the island of West Egg across from East Egg where his extravagant  friends Tom and Daisy live. They gossip and party a lot, and Tom is cheating on Daisy with a lady named Myrtle Wilson. Everyone knows except for Daisy and Mr. Wilson.

Nick lives next door to a mysterious man named Gatsby, who throws legendary parties, but no one knows anything about him. Nick becomes friends with him and learns that he is in love with Daisy. They almost married when they were younger, but he was too poor and decided to wait. He gets with Daisy again, and they have an affair.

Tom is suspicious of this, and he tries to prove that Gatsby is not who he seems. Daisy becomes enraged at Tom's superior chauvinist attitude, and says that she will leave Tom for Gatsby. However, she then finds out that Gatsby is not the respected pharmacist he claims to be. He gets his money through bootlegging.

Daisy then refuses to leave Tom for him, and makes him drive her home. Daisy is at the wheel when the car hits someone- coincidentally, Myrtle Wilson, Tom's other woman.

Mr. Wilson discovers his wife's affair, and asks around about the car that hit her (it is bright yellow and immediately recognizable). So, thinking that Gatsby hit her, Mr. Wilson goes to Gatsby's house and shoots him, and then shoots himself.

Gatsby dies alone, because no one shows up to his funeral except for Nick and his father. Tom and Daisy go to Chicago and Nick never sees them again.


2. Succinctly describe the theme of the novel. Avoid clichés.

Of the many themes in the novel, the one that stuck out to me the most was the shallowness of the upper class. Those who live in West Egg are the newly rich and they are vulgar, gaudy, and lacking in social skills. Gatsby lives in West Egg and his bright pink suit, his large mansion, and his Rolls-Royce all help to prove the point of being overly flashy. On the other hand, In East Egg are the rich old timers. They demonstrate taste, class, and charisma. The characters who live in West Egg are so used to money helping them get their way and at the end of the novel Gatsby realizes that isn’t the case. Because of his constant need of attention from Daisy, Gatsby does illegal things to get rich. His mansion, his car, and his money are all attained because he wants Daisy to love him again. Gatsby ends up dead because of all his efforts to impress Daisy.


3. Describe the author's tone. Include a minimum of three excerpts that illustrate your point(s).

This description of Tom Buchanan is an example of a threatening tone

            “He had changed since his New Haven years.  Now he was a sturdy, straw-haired man of thirty with a rather hard mouth and a supercilious manner.  Two shining, arrogant eyes had established dominance over his face and gave him the appearance of always leaning aggressively forward.  Not even…his riding clothes could hide the enormous power of that body—he seemed to fill those glistening boots until he strained the top lacing…It was a body capable of enormous leverage—a cruel body.”

            He forms an impression of Tom with his choice of words—hard, supercilious, arrogant, cruel.  There is no mistaking Buchanan for some gentle giant. The words have strong meaning used to represent how intense Tom is.
           
            A few paragraphs later, Fitzgerald’s tone momentarily creates a different mood as Nick walks into the beachfront living room in the Buchanan mansion.  Daisy, Tom’s wife, and her friend Jordan Baker are waiting:
           
            “The only completely stationary object in the room was an enormous couch on which two young women were buoyed up as though upon an anchored balloon.  They were both in white and their dresses were rippling and fluttering as if they had just been blown back after a short flight around the house.  I must have stood for a few moments listening to the whip and snap of the curtains and the groan of a picture on the wall.  Then there was a boom as Tom Buchanan shut the rear windows and the caught wind died out about the room and the curtains and the rugs and the two young women ballooned slowly to the floor.”

            The tone here is inquisitive and wanting to know more just like the reader is. It is not all knowing and makes it seem as we are finding things out as everyone else is also.

            Throughout the whole book the tone is similar but in the last passage it shifts dramatically. The tone is more down to Earth and demonstrates a negative view on the “American Dream” This is the last passage,

“Most of the big shore places were closed now and there were hardly any lights except the shadowy, moving glow of a ferryboat across the Sound. And as the moon rose higher the inessential houses began to melt away until gradually I became aware of the old island here that flowered once for Dutch sailors’ eyes—a fresh, green breast of the new world. Its vanished trees, the trees that had made way for Gatsby’s house, had once pandered in whispers to the last and greatest of all human dreams; for a transitory enchanted moment man must have held his breath in the presence of this continent, compelled into an aesthetic contemplation he neither understood nor desired, face to face for the last time in history with something commensurate to his capacity for wonder. 

And as I sat there brooding on the old, unknown world, I thought of Gatsby’s wonder when he first picked out the green light at the end of Daisy’s dock. He had come a long way to this blue lawn, and his dream must have seemed so close that he could hardly fail to grasp it. He did not know that it was already behind him, somewhere back in that vast obscurity beyond the city, where the dark fields of the republic rolled on under the night. 

Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgasmic future that year by year recedes before us. It eluded us then, but that’s no matter—to-morrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms farther. . . . And one fine morning—— 

So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.


 4. Describe a minimum of ten literary elements/techniques you observed that strengthened your understanding of the author's purpose, the text's theme and/or your sense of the tone. For each, please include textual support to help illustrate the point for your readers. (Please include edition and page numbers for easy reference.)

The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Scribner Paperback Fiction, Published by Simon & Schuster

CHARACTERIZATION 

1. Describe two examples of direct characterization and two examples of indirect characterization.  Why does the author use both approaches, and to what end (i.e., what is your lasting impression of the character as a result)?

One example of direct characterization would be when Nick is describing Tom Buchanan. He says, “He had changed since his New Haven years. Now he was a sturdy, straw haired man of thirty with a rather hard mouth and a supercilious manner. Two shining, arrogant eyes had established dominance over his face and gave him the appearance of always leaning aggressively forward. Not even the effeminate swank of his riding clothes could hide the enormous power of that body-he seemed to fill those glistening boots until he strained the top lacing and you could see a great pack of muscle shifting when his shoulder moved under his thin coat. It was a body capable of enormous leverage-a cruel body” Pg.11

Another direct characterization example is when Nick is describing Daisy. He says, “The other girl, Daisy, made an attempt to rise-she leaned slightly forward with a conscientious expression-then she laughed, an absurd, charming little laugh, and I laughed too and came forward into the room. Her face was sad and lovely with bright things in it, bright eyes and a bright passionate mouth-but there was an excitement in her voice that men who had cared for her found difficult to forget.” Pg.13

One example of indirect characterization would be when Nick is describing Miss Baker from the way she responds when told that Gatsby wants to speak to her. The passage reads, “She got up slowly, raising her eyebrows at me in astonishment, and followed the butler toward the house. I noticed that she wore her evening dress, all her dresses, like sports clothes-there was a jauntiness about her movements as if she had first learned to walk upon golf courses on clean, crisp mornings. ” Pg. 55

The last example of indirect characterization is when Nick is looking around and sees a woman crying while playing the piano. He is wondering why she is crying and another woman says “She had a fight with a man who says he’s her husband.” Pg.56

The author uses both approaches to characterization because it gives the novel variety when new characters are introduced. Too much of one style would get banal and the effectiveness is equal in both ways.


2. Does the author's syntax and/or diction change when s/he focuses on character?  How?  Example(s)?

Scott F. Fitzgeralds syntax stays the same throughout the whole novel as it is pretty clearly understood. What does change however, is the diction. Whenever Gatsby speaks, it shifts to much more playful words. He constantly is calling people an “old sport” and is done lightheartedly. An example would be when Gatsby is talking to Rather.

“Don’t mention it,” he joined me eagerly. “Don’t give it another thought, old sport.” The familiar expression held no more familiarity than the hand which reassuringly brushed my shoulder. “And don’t forget we’re going up in the hydroplane tomorrow morning at nine o’ clock.”


3. Is the protagonist static or dynamic?  Flat or round?  Explain.

Nick Carraway is the protagonist and the narrator. Nick is definitely a dynamic character and in contrast, Gatsby is a static character. Nick came to West Egg with a sense of disapproval for the extravagant type of life and

Nick Carraway is the protagonist and also the narrator. He gives us an inside scoop on the action as he is close with both Daisy and Gatsby. However, he should be considered a round and dynamic character. He expresses many emotions throughout various events in the novel and he has problems of his own. He is human like and deep. This clearly demonstrates how Nick Carraway is a round character. Nick Carraway can also be a dynamic character. Above all other characters, Nick is the only one that seems to truly learn a lesson from all of the unfortunate events. He is the only one who realizes the seriousness of the situations in the novel, especially surrounding Gatsby's death. Nick takes the responsibility to help arrange the funeral for Gatsby even after he died, even though he does not have to do anything at all. 


4. After reading the book did you come away feeling like you'd met a person or read a character?  Analyze one textual example that illustrates your reaction.

After reading this book, I truly felt as if I had lived in West/East Egg for about a year. The characters were developed well and going on this journey of meeting everyone was well worth it. One textual example that proves that the characters were like real people is here. Nick is asking Gatsby’s butler if Gatsby is okay.

            “Is Mr. Gatsby sick?”
            “Nope.” After a pause he added “sir” in a dilatory, grudging way.
            “I hadn’t seen him around and I was rather worried. Tell him Mr. Carraway came over.”   Pg.119
This passage shows that the characters are human sense they have some emotions. Nick cares about Gatsby and went to go visit him, as real friends would do.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Tools That Change the Way We Think


"Back in 2004, I asked [Google founders] Page and Brin what they saw as the future of Google search. 'It will be included in people's brains,' said Page. 'When you think about something and don't really know much about it, you will automatically get information.'
'That's true,' said Brin. 'Ultimately I view Google as a way to augment your brain with the knowledge of the world. Right now you go into your computer and type a phrase, but you can imagine that it could be easier in the future, that you can have just devices you talk into, or you can have computers that pay attention to what's going on around them and suggest useful information.'

'Somebody introduces themselves to you, and your watch goes to your web page,' said Page. 'Or if you met this person two years ago, this is what they said to you... Eventually you'll have the implant, where if you think about a fact, it will just tell you the answer."

-From In the Plex by Steven Levy (p.67)


Answer this not-so-simple question: How does extensive Internet/media/technology use change the way you think? Focus on your memory, your ability to concentrate, your sense of time and priorities, and the subjects/topics that interest you most. If you find "thinking about your thinking" difficult to assess, try the following strategies: compare yourself with older people who did most of their formal learning before smart phones and 2.0 existed; compare yourself with contemporaries who don't use those tools much today; read up on what education leaders and thinkers have to say about generational differences in thinking (and remember to cite your sources).

The expansion of internet and social networking sites have dramatically increased over the past ten years. People are now on their smart phones for a good part of the day, even me, and I believe that has a negative impact on society. The way we think, or lack of thinking, changes due to all of the devices that occupy our time and even minds. The main affect of Google / Facebook / Twitter / Instagram etc. is that these sites are a HUGE DISTRACTION. Most kids in high school probably check their phone an average of 20 times a day during school and it has even become a problem in the classroom that the devices are distractions. They cause students to not spend as much time on their homework and in turn, receive bad grades. Sense of time is almost non existent when on your phone and priorities are all out of whack, homework moves down the list and your phone moves up. Honestly, if for one day I didn't have any electronics I would probably get all my homework done at a reasonable time. I also would get an adequate amount of sleep, but due to TV and Facebook I get less sleep than I should. I get distracted so easily and these newfangled things are to blame. Also, they give us a false sense of knowledge and our study habits have gone down the drain. Whenever we don't know something now, we turn straight to our trusted friend Google for help. We start to type something in, and what do you know.. Google even reads our minds! It's crazy how a computer can know what we are thinking and unfortunately a lot of people do just that,they let Google do all the thinking for them. We have lost our skills to solve problems on our own and think in higher ways because we rely so much on the internet. I also believe that thinkers from the past such as Aristotle and Socrates are so much better at thinking than we are! They did not check their smart phones every five minutes and when there was a problem, they sat down and solved it. That's the way that things should be but technology is a thing of the future and we need take advantage of it. Make the computer work for us, don't let the computer work you.

Monday, October 22, 2012

Fall Vocab List #9

Abortive: failing to produce the intended result


Bruit: spread a report or rumor widely


Contumelious: scornful and insulting behavior


Dictum: a formal pronouncement from an authoritative source; a short statement that expresses a general truth or principle


Ensconce: establish or settle


Iconoclastic: characterized by attack on established beliefs or institutions


In medias res: a narrative that begins somewhere in the middle of a story rather than the beginning


Internecine: destructive to both sides in a conflict


Maladroit: ineffective or bungling; clumsy

Maudlin: self-pitying or tearfully sentimental, often through drunkenness


Modulate: exert a modifying or controlling influence on


Portentous: of or like a portent; done in a pompously or overly solemn manner


Prescience: the power to foresee the future


Quid pro quo: a favor or advantage granted in return for something


Salubrious: health-giving, healthy; pleasant, not run-down


Saturnalia: the ancient Roman festival of Saturn in December; an occasion of wild revelry


Touchstone: a standard or criterion by which something is judged or recognized


Traumatic: emotionally disturbing or distressing; relating to or causing psychological trauma


Vitiate
: spoil or impair the quality or efficiency of; destroy or impair the legal validity of


Waggish: humorous in a playful, mischievous, or facetious manner